Arun Pratap Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another
2025 Latest Caselaw 11300 ALL

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11300 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 October, 2025

Allahabad High Court

Arun Pratap Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 October, 2025

Author: Sanjay Kumar Pachori

Bench: Sanjay Kumar Pachori

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:177963

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34351 of 2025

Arun Pratap Singh And Another

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

.....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)

Ram Bahadur Singh, Suresh Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party(s)

:

G.A.

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Heard Sri Ram Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

The present application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1284 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 97 of 2021, under Sections 452, 323, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Link Road, District- Ghaziabad as well as charge sheet dated 08.08.2021, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division)/F.T.C., Ghaziabad.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment.

Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.

In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state that, in category A, one would expect a better exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused.