Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16919 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 May, 2024
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:85176 Court No. - 49 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 950 of 2024 Petitioner :- Anand Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 i.e. Tehsildar, Lalganj, District - Azamgarh to implement the judgment and order dated 08.11.2023 passed by Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, Lalganj, District - Azamgarh in Case No. 886 of 2022, Computerized Case No. T202215060400886 (State Vs. Shiv Poojan) Under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and take necessary action for removal of encroachment and recovery of compensation."
3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the writ petition is not maintainable for execution of orders passed by the Revenue Court in view of the judgment of Division Bench of this Court in case of Manbhavati Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2020 1 AWC 789A and Writ C No. 7863 of 2018 (Brij Bhushan Rai v. State of U.P. and 6 others).
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for redressal of his grievance.
Order Date :- 13.5.2024
Ved Prakash
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!