Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16231 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 May, 2024
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:82290 Court No. - 49 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 917 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vikas Maurya Respondent :- State Of Up And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to respondent no. 3 to conclude and decide the application dated 15-04-2024 submitted by the petitioner in respect of removed the encroachment from the chak road no 2505 situate in Mauja- Kathiraon (Lathia), Pargana Pandrah, Tehsil- Pindara, District Varanasi after demarcation within stipulated period of time."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in view of the judgment passed by this Court in Jahar Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2017(4) ADJ 619 as well as in Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ 226.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 26 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.5.2024
Ved Prakash
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!