Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd. Asad Ulla vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 3137 ALL

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3137 ALL
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2024

Allahabad High Court

Mohd. Asad Ulla vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 5 February, 2024





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:19295
 

 
Court No. - 93
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 44876 of 2023
 

 
Applicant :- Mohd. Asad Ulla
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Dharm Singh Parmar
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
 

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 18.7.2023 passed by C.J.M., Hamirpur in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1003 of 2023 (Mohd. Asadulla vs. Mohd. Kaleem and others) whereby the application filed by the applicant u/s 156(3) Cr.P.C. has been treated as complaint case.

3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned A.G.A. as per order of the Apex Court passed in the case of Radhey Shyam Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423, wherein it is observed that all the judicial orders will be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

4. This Court is of the view that Hon'ble Apex Court clearly observed in the aforesaid judgment that all the judicial orders will be challenged in the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, therefore, judicial orders should normally be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Prabhu Chawla Vs. State of Rajasthan and another, (2015) 17 SCC (562) observed that alternative remedy is not a bar to exercise jurisdiction u/s 482 Cr.P.C. in exceptional case. Therefore, in exceptional case application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. may be entertained against judicial order in the interest of justice.

5. In the present case, the applicant could not make out the case of exceptional nature, which could persuade this Court to exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

6. In view of the above legal position, applicant is permitted to file Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for challenging the impugned judicial order.

7. With the aforesaid observation, the present application is dismissed.

8. Certified copy of the impugned order, if any, may be returned to learned counsel for the applicant after retaining xerox copy of the same.

Order Date :- 5.2.2024

Vandana

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter