Allahabad High Court
Ashwani Tyagi vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 May, 2023
Bench: Krishan Pahal
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:97747
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4790 of 2023
Applicant :- Ashwani Tyagi
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Pranshu Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Pranshu Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri R.M. Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.
3. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.327 of 2022, registered under Sections 353, 354, 504 IPC and Section 3(a) of U.P. Medicare Service Persons and Medicare Service Institution (Prevention of Violence and Damage to Property) Act, 2013, at Police Station- Sighawali Ahir, District Baghpat with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.
4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have gone to get the booster dose to his wife at C.S.C., Pilana, Baghpat. The applicant is stated to have misbehaved with the informant and other officials and even stated to have outraged the modesty of the informant on 02.09.2022.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It was the applicant who was the victim and had even lodged a complaint against the informant on 02.09.2022 at 15:30 hours. Learned counsel has further stated that the present FIR was instituted on 03.09.2022 as a counterblast to the said application. Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length. There are no criminal antecedents of the applicant. The charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant has apprehension of his arrest. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes that he has co-operated in the investigation and is ready to do so in trial also failing which the State can move appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail.
6. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.
7. On due consideration to the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, the applicant is liable to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of "Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2020) 5 SCC 1". The future contingencies regarding the anticipatory bail being granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.
8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. Let the accused-applicant- Ashwani Tyagi be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime (supra) on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(iii). that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;
(iv). that in case charge-sheet is submitted the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;
(v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;
(vi). that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
(vii). that in case of breach of any of the above conditions the court below shall have the liberty to cancel the bail.
9. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and shall not affect the trial.
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Order Date :- 8.5.2023
Ravi Kant
