Allahabad High Court
Ishwar Chand vs State Of U.P. on 15 February, 2023
Bench: Siddharth
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 449 of 2023
Applicant :- Ishwar Chand
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anjali Singh Tomer,Inder Pal Singh Tomar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Abhinav Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Shri Abhinav Singh, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ishwar Chand, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 147 of 2020, under Sections 147,148,302,120-B IPC Police Station Chhapar, District- Muzaffar Nagar, during pendency of trial.
There is allegation against the applicant and four named and two unnamed accused that they have caused offence of rioting and murder of one person by hatching conspiracy.There is allegation that deceased had affair with daughter of the applicant.Applicant and other co-accused called the deceased in the night of 18/19 June, 2020,thereafter he did not returned.Subsequently his dead body was recovered.Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has been falsely implicated only being father of the girl with whom deceased had affair. Co-accused, Rohit and Vimal, have been granted bail by this court vide order dated 1.11.2022 and 1.12.2022 in Criminal Misc Bail Application Nos. 10195 and 10456 of 2021.The bail application of co-accused Lalit has been rejected by his court vide order dated2.2.2021.The charges have only been framed before the trial court as yet. The applicant is in jail since 20.6.2020 and has no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India; considering the dictum of Apex Court in the recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021; considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed
Let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
4. That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
5. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.
6. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the present case and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 15.2.2023
Atul kr. sri.
