Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhola Shankar vs State Of U.P.
2023 Latest Caselaw 21171 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 21171 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2023

Allahabad High Court
Bhola Shankar vs State Of U.P. on 8 August, 2023
Bench: Siddharth




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:159346
 
Court No. - 64
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31361 of 2023
 

 
Applicant :- Bhola Shankar
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Bhola Shankar, with a prayer to release him on bail in Complaint Case No. 3631 of 2021, under Sections 376,504,506 IPC Police Station Chauri Chaura, District- Gorakhpur, during pendency of trial.

There is allegation against the applicant of committing offence of rape and threatening of girl aged about 20 years.Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that present implication has been made by way of counter blast proceedings as father of the applicant lodged the First Information Report on 16.12.2019 as case crime no. 458 of 2019 under sections 376,323,452,354Ka,341,324,427,506 I.P.C. and section 7/8 POCSO Act against the brother and father of the complainant.Except the allegations made in the statement of the victim and witness recorded under section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. there is no corroborative evidence against the applicant . The applicant is in jail since 20.6.2023 and has no criminal history.

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India; considering the dictum of Apex Court in the recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021; considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed

Let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

4. That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

5. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.

6. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

Order Date :- 8.8.2023

Atul kr. sri.

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter