Shoaib Ahmad @ Sonu And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 15744 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 48
 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16234 of 2022
 
Petitioner :- Shoaib Ahmad @ Sonu And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar (Chandraul)
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.

Hon'ble Syed Waiz Mian,J.

Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.

The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 05.10.2022 registered as Case Crime No. 508 of 2022, under Sections-420, 352, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3 (1)(Da), 3(1)(Dha) and 3 (2)(v) of SC/ST Act, Police Station-Sungadhi, District-Pilibhit, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of impugned First Information Report.

The submission is that all alleged offences are punishable with imprisonment of seven years, therefore the police authorities are bound to follow the procedure laid down under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been wrongly implicated and could not be arrested. Reliance has been placed on the judgement of Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law and Justice and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 73 of 2015 with Criminal Appeal No. 1265 of 2017 Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2017 and co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court in Vimal Kumar & 3 others Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others in 2021 (2) ACR 1147.

We have gone through the impugned first information report and we are of the opinion that the guidelines framed by the Apex Court in the above noted judgements are equally applicable to the facts of the instant case.

Accordingly, the instant petition also stands disposed of in the light of the judgments as noted above.

Order Date :- 2.11.2022

Deepak/