Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3831 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 185 of 2000 Revisionist :- Ajit Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Amit Krishna,M.D.Singh Shekhar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision and the delay condonation application. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed against judgement and order dated 12.12.1997 passed by IXth Additional District Judge, Saharanpur in Criminal Case No.29 of 1995 by which the appeal was dismissed in default which was filed against judgement and order dated 02.08.1995 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur in Criminal Case No.201 of 1991 (M/s Sri Finance Versus Shri Ajit Kumar) under Section138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Saharanpur by which the revisionist was convicted for six months R.I. Being aggrieved, revisionist preferred present revision with delay.
3. This revision has been filed beyond time by 851 days.There is no proper explanation for condonation of delay.
4. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
5. Criminal revision as well as delay condonation application are dismissed.
6. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 23.5.2022
MN/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!