Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Munna @ Aafaq Hussain And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 3263 ALL

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3263 ALL
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2022

Allahabad High Court
Munna @ Aafaq Hussain And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ... on 18 May, 2022
Bench: Karunesh Singh Pawar



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 13
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2704 of 2022
 

 
Applicant :- Munna @ Aafaq Hussain And Others
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Saqib Siddiqui
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Syed Ahmad Abbas Zaidi
 

 
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel appearing on behalf of private respondent as also learned A.G.A..

By means of present petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.31859 of 2016 State vs. Munna and others, arising out of case crime No.208 of 2015 under sections 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Talkatora, district Lucknow.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have entered into compromise outside the court. On the basis of compromise which is on record, a petition under section 482 CrPC, bearing No. 4824 of 2021 was filed by the petitioners. The said petition has been disposed of vide order dated 26.11.2021 whereby, the trial court was directed to verify the compromise in presence of the parties. In compliance of the said order, the parties have appeared before the trial court and the learned Magistrate has verified the compromise in the presence of the parties vide order dated 18.12.2021 which is on record.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the dispute between the petitioners and private respondent has been amicably settled by way of compromise, which has been verified under orders of this Court. Therefore, the impugned proceedings are liable to be quashed.

Learned counsel has relied on judgment of Supreme Court in (2012)10 SCC 303 Gian Singh versus State of Punjab and another and (2014)6 SCC 466 Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another and Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others versus State of Gujarat and another (2017)9 SCC 641.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 concedes the arguments advanced by petitioners' counsel.

On due consideration to the submission(s) of parties' counsel, the compromise entered into between the parties as well as the verification report, the judgment in aforesaid cases and perusal of the record, this Court is of the view that the impugned proceedings are liable to be and are hereby quashed.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.

Order Date :- 18.5.2022

kkb/

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter