Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7692 ALL
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 436 of 2018 Revisionist :- Mukesh Kumar Tripathi @ Bauwan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Vidhu Bhushan,Vineeta Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. Present revision under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 has been filed against the judgment and order dated 12.04.2018 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge/ Fast Track Court No.1, Unnao awarding maintenance of Rs.3,000/- to the wife of the revisionist and Rs.4,000/- to the son of the revisionist.
2. I have gone through the judgment and perused the record. I do not find that learned Court below has committed any error of law or facts in passing the impugned order awarding meager amount of maintenance to the wife and son of the revisionist.
3. Thus, this revision being devoid of merit and substance, is hereby dismissed.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 21.7.2022
prateek
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!