Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1238 ALL
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 93 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1186 of 1996 Revisionist :- Devendra Khanna Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajul Bhargava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
Heard Sri Abhishek Shukla, learned A.G.A.-I for the State.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 12.08.1996 passed by Family Judge, Jhansi in Case No. 85 of 1991 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Smt. Anita Khanna Vs. Devendra Khanna, sentencing the revisionist for a period of nine months simple imprisonment under Section 125 (3) Cr.P.C.
Learned A.G.A.-I submits that the present revision is of the year, 1996 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A.-I. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order passed by the court below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A.-I that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Let the lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.
Order Date :- 12.4.2022/Arvind
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!