Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4659 ALL
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 17 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 8785 of 2021 Petitioner :- Subeylal Yadav Respondent :- U.O.I.Thru.Ministry Of Defense New Delhi & Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Awaneesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G. Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Surya Bhan Pandey, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents raised preliminary objection in regard to the maintainability of writ petition before this Court by making submission that department in which the petitioner was working has been notified under Section 14 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, therefore, the petitioner has remedy to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal in view of the judgment rendered in the case of L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and others; AIR 1997 SC 1125.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
However, petitioner is at liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, Lucknow for redressal of his grievances.
Order Date :- 25.3.2021
Gautam
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!