Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6431 ALL
Judgement Date : 18 June, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 36 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11511 of 2021 Petitioner :- Subedar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yashpal Yadav,Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ten Singh Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner could neither connect to the link given to him nor picking up his phone.
It is said by learned Standing Counsel for the State that the matter pertains to election of Gram Sabha. According to Standing Counsel, elections are already over and this petition, therefore, can be said to have become infructuous.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
However, if the petitioner gives instruction to his counsel that he wants a judgment on merits, this petition may be revived after intimation to the counsel for the other side.
Order Date :- 18.6.2021
Shiraz
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!