Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh Chandra And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another
2021 Latest Caselaw 511 ALL

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 511 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2021

Allahabad High Court
Suresh Chandra And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 January, 2021
Bench: Yogendra Kumar Srivastava



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 84
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19660 of 2020
 

 
Applicant :- Suresh Chandra And Another
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Arvind Kumar, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-opposite party no. 1 and perused the record.

This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 11.10.2019 as well as cognizance order dated 3.9.2020 in criminal proceeding of case no. 4184 of 2020 (State of U.P. vs. Suresh Chandra and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 764 of 2019 under Sections 323, 324, 325, 308 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Bulandshahar.

Learned counsel for the applicants at the very outset has fairly submitted that the necessary grounds for invoking the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 CrPC have not been made out in the facts of the present case. Accordingly, he does not wish to press his prayer as made in the present application.

In view of the above, the relief as sought in the instant application is refused.

At this stage counsel for the applicants has made an alternative prayer for a direction to be issued to the court below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants, expeditiously in accordance with law.

Considering the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that in case the applicants appear and surrender before the concerned court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the court below in accordance with law keeping in view of the seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 CrLJ 755 as well as judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. (2009) 4 SCC 437.

For the period of 30 days from today or till the date of appearance of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the above case.

With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 CrPC is disposed of.

Order Date :- 8.1.2021

Shalini

(Dr. Y.K.Srivastava,J.)

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter