Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pankaj Kumar vs State Of U.P.
2021 Latest Caselaw 9264 ALL

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9264 ALL
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021

Allahabad High Court
Pankaj Kumar vs State Of U.P. on 2 August, 2021
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Pachori



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 68
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19561 of 2021
 

 
Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Shadab Alam
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

Heard Sri Sanjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Shadab Alam, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record of the case.

An exemption application has been filed on behalf of the applicant along with present application for exempting the filing of certified copy of the F.I.R. as it could not be made available to the applicant due to COVID-19.

The exemption application is allowed.

The filing of certified copy of the F.I.R. is hereby exempted.

The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant, Pankaj Kumar, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 95 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420 and 120-B I.P.C., and Section 3/9 of the U. P. Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act. 1998, Police Station- Civil Lines, District- Moradabad, during pendency of trial.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next contended that nothing incriminating articles has been recovered from the possession of the accused; the applicant has been implicated in the present case on the ground that his face did not match with the admit card. He further submitted that applicant is a student and he is preparing for competitive examinations. It is further submitted that there is no criminal antecedent to his credit. It is next submitted that there is also no possibility of the applicant either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. The applicant, who is languishing in jail since 01.02.2021, undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. In case the applicant is released on bail, he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

Considering the facts of the case and keeping in mind, the ratio of the Apex Court's judgment in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1978 SC 429, larger mandate of Article 21 of the constitution of India, the nature of accusations, the nature of evidence in support thereof, the severity of punishment which conviction will entail, the character of the accused-applicant, circumstances which are peculiar to the accused, reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the trial, reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being tampered with, the larger interest of the public/ State and other circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail.

Let applicant, Pankaj Kumar, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions-

1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification.

Order Date :- 2.8.2021

Ishan

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter