Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4899 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1172 of 2013 Appellant :- Shyam Das Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Arvind K. Pandey,Ashok Kumar Singh,Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Amit Mishra,Gyan Prakash,Pranay Krishna Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the appellant is taken on record.
Sri Arvind Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the accused-appellant has submitted that according to his own calculation, the accused-appellant has to under go default sentence of four months and he wants to deposit proportionate fine, but learned court below is not permitting him to deposit the same.
It appears to be strange why the court below is not permitting him to deposit the fine. Hence, the court below is directed that if the accused-appellant seeks to deposit the fine, the same may be deposited and as per rules the same may be communicated to the Superintendent Jail, Ghaziabad.
List the case after four weeks.
Order Date :- 22.5.2019
RCT/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!