Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 4144 ALL
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6144 of 2011 Petitioner :- Brahma Dutt Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Jaiswal,Anubhav Chandra,P.K. Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish K.Tyagi Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 16.12.2016.
The petitioner has applied for recall of the above order, with some delay.
We are satisfied that the petitioner was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the restoration application within time.
Cause shown for the absence of the counsel when the case was taken up on the relevant date is sufficient.
Accordingly, we condon the delay and allow the Delay Condonation Application No.114244 of 2017. The Restoration Application No.114246 of 2017 is also allowed and the writ petition is directed to be restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.1000/- which shall be deposited within two weeks' to be utilized for the benefit of litigants.
Order Date :- 6.5.2019
Pramod Tripathi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!