Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 399 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13793 of 2005 Applicant :- Vaibhav Maheshwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- V.P. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
On the case being taken up, no one is present on behalf of the applicant to press application, whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears from the record that earlier also when the case was taken up, no one was present on behalf of the applicant.
It is pertinent to mention here that after split of the district Moradabad, a new district was created and by impugned order learned court below directed to send letter to the District Judge for transfer of S.T. No. 598 of 2004 (State of U.P. Vs. Vaibhav Maheshwari & others) to the Sessions Court, Jyoti Ba-Phule Nagar (J.P. Nagar). The impugned order does not warrant any interference under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
In the circumstances, applicant lacks merit and it is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.3.2019
RCT/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!