Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nisha Rajpoot vs State Of U.P.
2019 Latest Caselaw 5754 ALL

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 5754 ALL
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2019

Allahabad High Court
Nisha Rajpoot vs State Of U.P. on 8 July, 2019
Bench: Umesh Chandra Tripathi



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 77
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24397 of 2019
 

 
Applicant :- Nisha Rajpoot
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Hemendra Kumar
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ved Prakash Mishra
 

 
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

List revised.

No one has appeared on behalf of informant/opposite party no.2 to argue the case.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

This bail application has been moved by the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 132 of 2019, under Sections 376, 120B I.P.C. and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station-Nagina, District-Bijnor.

As per prosecution version, co-accused Sheeshpal was teaching the prosecutrix, aged about 15 years. Co-accused Sheeshpal and Ankur had committed rape on her. First information report was lodged on the information of the prosecutrix by her father against co-accused Sheeshpal and Ankur under Sections 376 I.P.C. and 3/4 & 5/6 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

Learned counsel for the applicant contended that applicant is not named in the F.I.R. even though the first information report was lodged on the information of the prosecutrix. Allegation of rape has been made against the co-accused Sheeshpal and Ankur. Only allegation of conspiracy which has been made against the applicant is an afterthought by legal advice. Even in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., prosecutrix has not assigned any role to the applicant. Applicant is languishing in jail since 18.05.2019 having no criminal antecedents.

Learned A.G.A., has opposed the prayer for bail. However, admitted this fact that applicant was not named either in the first information report or in the statement of prosecutrix under Section 161 Cr.P.C. For the first time prosecutrix in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. narrated the involvement of the applicant that applicant locked the door in which prosecutrix and co-accused Ankur was present.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find it a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Let the applicant- Nisha Rajpoot, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Application stands allowed.

Order Date :- 8.7.2019

AKT

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter