Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kishori Lal And Ors. vs State
2019 Latest Caselaw 6357 ALL

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 6357 ALL
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2019

Allahabad High Court
Kishori Lal And Ors. vs State on 1 August, 2019
Bench: Sudhir Agarwal



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 34
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1263 of 1992
 

 
Revisionist :- Kishori Lal And Ors.
 
Opposite Party :- State
 
Counsel for Revisionist :- R.K. Pandey,S.K. Shukla
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

1. Heard Sri R.K. Pandey, learned counsel for revisionists and learned A.G.A. for State.

2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by the judgments and orders dated 11.02.1991 and 27.08.1992. The First Additional Munsif Magistrate, Banda vide judgment and order dated 11.02.1991 convicted revisionists and sentenced them to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment under Section 147 IPC; six months rigorous imprisonment under Section 323/34 IPC; two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 325/149 IPC; and, six months rigorous imprisonment under Section 342 IPC. Thereagainst, revisionists preferred Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 1991 and Appellate Court while dismissing appeal vide judgment and order dated 27.08.1992, confirmed order of conviction and sentence passed by Trial Court. Being aggrieved the revisionist preferred present revision.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for revisionists that release of revisionists was sought by giving benefit of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ?Act, 1958?) but Trial Court rejected the same without giving any reason and Lower Appellate Court has also not examined this aspect of the matter. The accused-revisionists have no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the revisionists further prayed for taking lenient view and extending the benefit of Section 4 of Act, 1958 to accused-revisionists.

4. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that he has no objection if the conviction of accused-revisionists is maintained.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this revision deserves to be allowed in part on the point of sentence. The conviction of accused-revisionists recorded by Court below is hereby affirmed and upheld. The quantum of sentence is being modified. Revisionists be released giving benefit of Section 4 of Act, 1958 on execution of personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with photograph on the condition of maintaining peace and good behaviour for a period of two years from the date of acceptance of bond by the concerned Court below. The personal bond shall be filed to the satisfaction of concerned Court below. In the event of breach of aforesaid conditions, the Court below would be competent to summon the accused and would be at liberty to pass appropriate orders for sentence against accused-revisionists in accordance with law, keeping in view the judgment of Lower Appellate Court.

6. With the aforesaid observations, this revision is partly allowed and judgment and order dated 27.08.1992 passed by Lower Appellate Court is modified accordingly.

7. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.

Order Date :- 1.8.2019

AK

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter