Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 2716 ALL
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 36 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4700 of 2019 Petitioner :- Inder Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Yogendra Singh Bohra Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Sri Y.S. Bohra appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 has pointed out various discrepancies in the present petition. The relation of the petitioner with the deceased though has been mentioned but it has not been disclosed as to whether the deceased employee was unmarried at that point of time.
The Basic Education Officer, Hathras is a necessary party, who has not been impleaded.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with correct details.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
Order Date :- 9.4.2019
Harshita
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!