Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 2495 ALL
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4852 of 2015 Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad Respondent :- Smt. Gayatri Devi Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Singh,Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.K. Gupta,A K Aditya,S D Singh,Surendra Bahadur Singh Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
The revisional court in its impugned judgement has relied upon the plaint of Original Suit No. 1107 of 1990 in holding that the petitioner had knowledge of the fact that the disputed shop had been purchased by the plaintiff-respondent. However, copy of the plaint of the said suit has not been filed.
Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to bring on record copy of plaint of the said suit by means of supplementary affidavit
List after two weeks to enable him to file supplementary affidavit.
Interim order is extended till the next date of listing.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 3.4.2019
skv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!