Rijwan And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
2018 Latest Caselaw 549 ALL

Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 549 ALL
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2018

Allahabad High Court

Rijwan And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 15 May, 2018

Bench: Ramesh Sinha, Dinesh Kumar Singh-I




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 1
 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12408 of 2018
 
Petitioner :- Rijwan And Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Pandey
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
 
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.

Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.

Heard Sri Girijesh Pandey, holding brief of Sri Brijesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri A.K.Sand, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned FIR as well as material brought on record.

The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 28.4.2018, registered as case crime No.256 of 2018, under Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Swar, District Rampur.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case with malafide intention.He further submits that the petitioners were not arrested on the spot and the two persons who were arrested on the spot disclosed the name of the petitioners for their involvement in the present case. The allegations levelled against the petitioners are absolutely false, frivolous and baseless. From a perusal of the FIR, no offence is made out against the petitioners, hence, the same be quashed.

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for quashing of the FIR which discloses cognizable offence.

The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.

From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)

Order Date :- 15.5.2018/NS