Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 1673 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 July, 2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 29 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 254 of 2005 Revisionist :- Brijendra Kumar Misra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And 3 Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Rakesh Kumar Tripathi,Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,Sampurnanand,Wasim Ahmad Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned Additional Government Advocate Sri Aniruddha Singh and Sri Wasim Ahmad, learned counsel for the opposite party Nos.2 to 4.
Sri Prabhu Ranjan Tripathi, learned counsel for the revisionist, has concluded his arguments.
List this case on 03.08.2018 along with Criminal Revision No.366 of 2005; State of U.P. vs. Kanhaiya Lal Tiwari.
On the said date, learned Additional Government Advocate and Sri Wasim Ahmad shall submit their respective arguments.
Order Date :- 23.7.2018
Suresh/
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!