Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 4283 ALL
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 57 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 42370 of 2003 Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P. Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised. Nobody is present on behalf of petitioner.
The writ petition was preferred in the year 2003 with the prayer to quash the order of suspension dated 5.8.2000 (Annexure no.1 to the writ petition).
In the writ petition detailed order was passed by this Court on 19.9.2003. By the aforesaid order the Hon'ble Court was pleased to stay the effect and operation of the order dated 5.8.2000 until further orders and the respondents were directed to conclude the enquiry as expeditiously as possible preferably within three months.
In the circumstances, it appears that either by efflux of time the writ petition has now become infructuous or the relief sought for by him has already been granted in his favour.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands discharged. However, petitioner is granted liberty to move recall application in case cause of action still survives or this order cause any prejudice to his interest.
Order Date :- 12.12.2018
Pramod Tripathi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!