Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 6077 ALL
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 1 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 1015 of 2017 Appellant :- Radheyshyam & 13 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Appellant :- Rahul Sahai Counsel for Respondent :- Mahabir Yadav Hon'ble Bachchoo Lal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6/4-caveator and perused the record.
The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law,
1. whether, since there was a dispute with regard to the identification of the suit property and encroachment thereof, it was incumbent upon the courts below to have called for a survey commission. In the absence of which, the impugned judgement/ decree of both the courts below stand vitiated ?
Issue notice to the remaining respondents.
Summon the lower court record.
Steps be taken within ten days.
List after receipt of lower court record for final hearing.
Till the next date of listing, parties are directed to maintain staus-quo of the property in suit.
Order Date :- 31.10.2017
Gss
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!