Allahabad High Court
Randhir Singh vs The State Of U.P. on 3 October, 2017
Bench: Ravindra Nath Mishra-Ii
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 13
Case :- BAIL No. - 3054 of 2017
Applicant :- Randhir Singh
Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Raghunath Prasad,Prince Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Mishra-II,J.
Heard learned counsel for accused-applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and gone through entire record.
Applicant Randhir Singh is involved in case crime no. 830 of 2013, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C police station Shahabad district Hardoi.
It has been contended by learned counsel for accused-applicant that the accused-applicant is alleged to have executed sale deed of land belonging to Shyam Pal Singh, another accused, by impersonating accused Shyam Pal Singh.
Learned counsel for accused-applicant has submitted that Shyam Pal Singh who is owner of disputed land has no grievance, neither he has filed any F.I.R. He himself has been arrayed as an accused. He has further submitted that accused-applicant has never executed the sale deed. His photographs has been misused. He has never signed the sale deed.
Keeping in view all facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-applicant, and without entering into merit of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let applicant Randhir Singh accused of above-mentioned crime number, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:
(i) the applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(ii). the applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(iii). in case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code; and
(iv) the applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 3.10.2017
Pachhere/-
