Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7406 ALL
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 35 Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 317 of 2015 Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Respondent :- Hari Om Anand Counsel for Appellant :- Manu Ghildyal Counsel for Respondent :- Amit Mahajan Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant is allowed to reframe the questions of law and accordingly the appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law.
"(1) Whether the finding recorded by the ITAT with regard to shops in question being stock-in-trade is perverse?
(2) Whether the ITAT erred in law in holding that the provision of Section 50C of the I.T. Act, 1961 would not apply in the facts and circumstances of the present case?"
Order Date :- 29.11.2017
pks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!