Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 764 ALL
Judgement Date : 16 May, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21172 of 2017 Petitioner :- Shashi Pratap Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jeevan Prakash Sharma,Munna Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
Hon'ble Mrs. Rekha Dikshit,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent No.2 to provide no objection certificate in favour of Essar Oil Ltd. under Rule 144 Sub-clause-5 of the Petroleum Rules 2002.
For the reasons best known to the petitioner after making mention of the pendency of the earlier writ petition bearing No. 55030 of 2016 (Reference paragraph 13 of the present writ petition) what prayer was made in the writ petition has not been stated. This Court, therefore, required the learned counsel for the petitioner to inform the Court as to what is the prayer made in the writ petition No.55030 of 2016. Today it has been admitted by the petitioner that the prayer made in the present petition and in Writ Petition No.55030 of 2016 is one and the same.Two writ petitions for same cause need not be entertained. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to petitioner to bring the subsequent developments on the record of first writ petition itself.
The writ petition is dismissed.
(Rekha Dikshit,J.) (Arun Tandon,J)
Order Date :- 16.5.2017
G.S
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!