Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 561 ALL
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 37 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 368 of 2014 Revisionist :- Raju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Santosh Kumar Dubey,Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Utkarsh Pandey Hon'ble Daya Shankar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA for the State-opposite party No.1 and learned counsel for opposite party No.2.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has received an oral information from the Parokar of revisionist that the revisionist has completed the period of imprisonment imposed against him and he has deposited the amount of Rs.2,000/- as fine imposed against him, but he has no document to show that the revisionist has undergone the period of imprisonment and deposited the amount of fine.
Learned AGA may obtain the aforesaid information from the Jail Authorities.
List on 29.05.2017.
Order Date :- 12.5.2017
atul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!