Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2385 ALL
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 19 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 1405 of 2003 Petitioner :- Smt.Anjali Nakra Respondent :- U.P.Police Avas Nigam Through Chairman Cum M.D.And 1 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Amitabh Misra,Rajesh Shukla,S.P. Shukla,Vishnu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Rajesh Tiwari,B.R.Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
Cause shown is sufficient. Recall application is allowed. The writ petition is restored to its original number.
Counsel for petitioner is present. No one is present for respondents.
Counsel for petitioner points out that rejoinder affidavit filed on 21.11.2010 and rejoinder to the amended petition filed in February 2014 are not on record.
Office is directed to place the same on record.
List in the next cause list.
Order Date :- 14.7.2017
psd
(Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!