Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhanu Pratap Singh vs Union Of India & Others
2017 Latest Caselaw 2197 ALL

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2197 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2017

Allahabad High Court
Bhanu Pratap Singh vs Union Of India & Others on 11 July, 2017
Bench: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, Vivek Chaudhary



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 1
 

 
Case :- LAND ACQUISITION No. - 48 of 2000
 

 
Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Singh
 
Respondent :- Union Of India & Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Mehrotra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- B.B.Saxena,Deepak Seth,Ravi Prakash
 

 
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.

Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.

Heard Sri S.K. Mehrotra, the learned counsel for petitioner.

The petitioner along with the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 are claiming compensation for the acquisition of a premises which has been described in the impugned order of the Claims Commissioner as House No. 10/12/16 (old no. 642/501).

The petition discloses that the petitioner and the opposite parties no. 4 and 5 had already settled the dispute to the extent of share as was being claimed by them before the Claims Commissioner. In essence,  it appears that the petitioner as against the contesting respondent was only to the extent of share which according to the petitioner has already been settled. Notices were issued to all the respondents vide order dated 24.08.2000.

During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent 4 died. A substitution application was filed on which notices were issued to proposed heirs whereafter the application was allowed and the amendment in the array of parties has been carried out. Notices to the proposed heirs were sent on several occasions, but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent nos. 4 to 6. Presumably because they also sail in the same boat as the petitioner in respect of the claim of enhancement of compensation and its wrong fixation under the impugned order.

Sri S. B. Pandey, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India for the respondent nos. 1 and 3 prays that the matter may be adjourned for today in order to enable him to assist the Court after going through the records.

The matter is adjourned for today.

List in the next  cause list showing the name of Sri S.B. Pandey as counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 3.

Order Date :- 11.7.2017

psd

(Vivek Chaudhary,J.) (Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.)

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter