Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 7753 ALL
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 58280 of 2017 Petitioner :- Som Datt Pandey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjiv Kumar Pandey,Rajeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J.
Heard Sri Sanjiv Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1, 2, 3 and 5 and Sri Ajun Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.
The petitioners in the writ petition are seeking quashing of the notice dated 19.12.2015 with a further prayer that the respondents may be restrained from interfering in the petitioners' peaceful possession over the Gata No.1139 situated in Village Tititihara, Tehsil Karvi, District Chitrakoot.
Prima facie the writ petition is barred by laches. Secondly, the petitioners have a remedy of submitting their reply to the notice dated 19.12.2015. Therefore, I do not find any good ground for interference in the writ petition.
The writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 6.12.2017
N Tiwari
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!