Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3388 ALL
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 36992 of 2017 Petitioner :- Dr. Hemendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Man Mohan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Archana Singh Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
We have heard Sri Man Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Smt. Archana Singh learned counsel for respondent No. 3.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the facts of this case are similar to the facts involved in Writ Petition No. 23433 of 2017 (Dr. Shailendra Singh and Others Vs. State Of U.P. and 2 Others) which is pending and counter affidavit has been called for.
The factum of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners has not been disputed by learned counsel for the respondents.
Issue notice.
Notices on behalf respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have been accepted by the office of learned Chief Standing Counsel and Smt. Archana Singh has put in appearance for respondent No. 3, therefore, notices need not to be served to the aforesaid respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents may file counter affidavit within three weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List thereafter alongwith the record of Writ Petition No. 23433 of 2017, Dr. Shailendra Singh and Others Vs. State Of U.P. and 2 Others.
Order Date :- 18.8.2017
Swati
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!