Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3355 ALL
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 56 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 873 of 2006 Applicant :- Anand Chauhan & Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Sisodia,Atul Sisodia Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
Heard Sri Dhirenra Kumar Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rajeev Sisodia, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Perusal of record shows that the notices issued to the opposite party no.2 has not been received back.
At this stage learned counsel for the applicants submitted that this Criminal Misc. Application No.873 of 2006 has become infructuous, therefore he does not want to press it.
Therefore, this Criminal Misc. Application No.873 of 2006 (Anand Chauhan and others vs. State of U.P. and another) is dismissed as not pressed on being infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 18.8.2017
Swati
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!