Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3263 ALL
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 48 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22594 of 2017 Applicant :- Yogendra Pratap Singh & 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Murtuza Ali,Imtiyaj Ali,O.P. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Bachchoo Lal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that there is civil dispute in between the parties. The applicant no. 1 has filed a civil suit no. 489 of 1994 against the father of the opp. party no. 2. In that case order of status quo was passed by the court concerned vide order dated 14.11.1994. The civil suit is still pending. Only to make pressure upon the applicants, this false and frivolous complaint has been filed against the applicants. In fact, the applicants have not committed the alleged offence. No offence is made out against the applicants. The summoning order dated 7.6.2017 is not in accordance with law. The present prosecution has been instituted only for the purpose of harassment.
Learned A.G.A. has accepted notice on behalf of State.
Issue notice to the opp. party no. 2 who may file counter affidavit within a period of three weeks. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within a week thereafter.
List thereafter.
Till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in complaint case no. 361 of 2016, Rajendra Kumar Mishra Vs. indu Prakash Singh and others, under Sections 352, 427 I.P.C. Police Station Saray Inayat, District Allahabad.
Order Date :- 16.8.2017
Gss
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!