Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6639 ALL
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 4 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8592 of 2016 Petitioner :- Ram Nath Respondent :- Rita And 32 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Pratap Gupta Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The plaintiff-respondents Ist set has obtained interim injunction in O.S. No. 471 of 2011 (Reeta and others vs. Anwar and others).
The objections of the petitioner to the interim injunction application are not being decided and are pending for several years.
The petitioner has preferred this petition for a direction to the court below to decide the application (Paper No. 7C) filed in the above suit on consideration of his objections expeditiously within a time bound period.
In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kushinagar, to consider and decide the above application (Paper No. 7C) in accordance with law, expeditiously if possible within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 24.10.2016
v.k.updh.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!