Gopi Ram And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another
2016 Latest Caselaw 6553 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 48
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29303 of 2016
 

 
Applicant :- Gopi Ram And 2 Others
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.

The present application has been filed by the applicants under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case no. 1649 of 2016, under Sections 323, 452, 506 IPC, Police Station Milak Khanam, District Rampur arising out of summoning order dated 14.6.2016 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2, Rampur. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the complaint was filed  on the basis of false facts and also on the basis of malice.  It is further submitted that from the version of the complaint as well as statement of witnesses, offence under the aforesaid Sections is not made out against the applicants. General allegations have been made in the complaint. The impugned order suffers from illegality and infirmity.

On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that applicants have been summoned on the basis of the statements recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 Cr.P.C.. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the entire record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. The Magistrate dealing with complaint at this stage has to see only prima-facie case and it cannot be said that no prima-facie case is made out against the applicants. Further, the plea raised before this Court would require leading of evidence, which can be raised before the court concerned at the appropriate Stage. Hence, the prayer made in the present application is refused.

However, in case the applicants surrender before the court below and apply for bail the same shall be considered and decided by the court below in view of settled law.

Thus the application is disposed of. 

Order Date :- 19.10.2016

Sachdeva