Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sumit Rajput And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another
2016 Latest Caselaw 6336 ALL

Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6336 ALL
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2016

Allahabad High Court
Sumit Rajput And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 October, 2016
Bench: Harsh Kumar



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 53
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27388 of 2016
 

 
Applicant :- Sumit Rajput And Another
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Tripathi,Anupama Tripathi
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 
Hon'ble Harsh Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been moved for quashing the entire criminal proceedings initiated with cognizance order dated 21.01.2016 of Chief Metropolitant Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar on Charge-Sheet No. 541 of 2015, dated 25.11.2015 arising out of Case Crime No. 1118 of 2015, Under Sections 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. Police Station ? Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar, in pursuance of F.I.R dated 04.11.2015.

Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusal of record at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which are to be decided by trial court upon evidence before it and cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima-facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence cannot be considered at this stage.

In view of discussions made above, I find that the applicant has failed to show any sufficient ground for exercise of inherent powers by this Court so as to prevent any abuse of process of court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice and there is no sufficient ground for quashing the entire proceeding initiated with cognizance order dated 21.01.2016 of Chief Metropolitant Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar on Charge-Sheet No. 541 of 2015, dated 25.11.2015 arising out of Case Crime No. 1118 of 2015, Under Sections 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. Police Station ? Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar, in pursuance of F.I.R dated 04.11.2015. The application is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed.

However, if the applicant appears before the trial court and moves application for bail, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.

The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C is dismissed accordingly.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Order Date :- 03.10.2016

Vinod.

 

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter