Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3044 ALL
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 19 Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 439 of 2012 Appellant :- Anusuchit Jati Primary Pathshala And Another Respondent :- Tapesar Prasad And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vashitha Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- A.K.Singh Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the appellant requests for time to file substitution application after death of respondent no. 2/1 Chhedi Prasad but it is on record, as already mentioned in order dated 16.5.2016 of this, that respondent no. 2/1 Chhedi Prasad was unnecessarily impleaded as party of this appeal, therefore, this Court find no reason for his substitution. Office is directed to strike out the name of respondent no. 2/1 Chhedi Prasad and noted "dead" infront of it.
List for hearing in the 3rd week of July, 2016 peremptorily.
Order Date :- 26.5.2016
Sanjeev
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!