Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4061 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 28313 of 2016 Petitioner :- Harendra Respondent :- D.D.C., Azamgarh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Hausala Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.
In the impugned order, the Deputy Director of Consolidation has recorded a finding that original holding of the respondents has been allotted to the petitioner as such he allowed the revision and the chak of the respondents was allotted on his original holding.
The counsel for the petitioner submits that Settlement Officer Consolidation allotted chak to the petitioner on plot no. 1016 due to reason that it was situated in front of the house of the petitioner. But neither the report of Consolidator nor map showing that these plots were situated in front of the house of the petitioner, has been filed.
As prayed, put up as fresh on 21. 7.2016.
Order Date :- 11.7.2016
Rahul /-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!