Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 4924 ALL
Judgement Date : 5 August, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 34 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2020 of 2005 Revisionist :- Rashid And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sarwar Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revised. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by order dated 31.01.2005 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Jaunpur in Case No. 1876 of 2004 summoning the revisionists under Sections 498-A, 506 I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Having gone through the impugned order, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality so as to warrant interference.
4. Dismissed.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 5.8.2016
PS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!