Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2428 ALL
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 24 Case :- RENT CONTROL No. - 110 of 1999 Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Pandey Respondent :- Sukh Sagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- Chief Standing Counsel,S.K.Srivastava Hon'ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora,J.
Case called out. Counsel for the petitioner is not present.
Ms Appoli Srivastava appearing for the opposite party no. 1 states that this writ petition has become infructuous as the possession of premises in dispute has been handed over by the petitioner-tenant to the landlord.
As the Counsel for the petitioner is not present, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.9.2015
MH/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!