Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 2898 ALL
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 23 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 352 of 2012 Revisionist :- Smt. Seema Pandare & Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Revisionist :- K.K. Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Pratyush Kumar,J.
Misc.Delay Condonation Appln.No.209056 of 2012
Delay is condoned.
Order Date :- 5.10.2015
SKD
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 352 of 2012
Revisionist :- Smt. Seema Pandare & Another
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- K.K. Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Pratyush Kumar,J.
No one appears on behalf of the revisionist even in the revised list.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is present for the State.
This revision is listed under the heading 'Likely to be infructuous (Without Objection)'.
The revision relates to the year 2012.
It appears from the record that the cause of action which, gave rise to filing of the present revision, does not survive.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 5.10.2015
SKD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!