Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1578 ALL
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 920 of 2003 Revisionist :- Santosh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Bharat Bhushan Paul Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one is present on behalf of revisionist.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
The name of Sri G.P. Dikshit, Advocate is printed in the cause list on behalf of opposite party.
Vide order dated 28.03.2003 passed by this Court the operation of the revisional Court order dated 08.01.2003 in Criminal Revision No. 77 of 2002, was stayed.
Stay order dated 28.03.2003, is hereby vacated.
It appears that due to efflux of time, this revision has become infructuous and the revisionist not interested to further prosecute this case.
In view of above, office is directed to notify this revision as " likely to be infructuous".
List after four weeks, under the above head.
Order Date :- 31.7.2015
M Zaid
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!