Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 5451 ALL
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25014 of 2008 Petitioner :- Modi Sugar Mills Respondent :- Union Of India And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yashwant Varma,Diptiman Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I./2008/1000,Ravindra Singh Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that prayer no.1, 2 and 3 of the present writ petition have become infructuous by passage of time. So far as prayer no. 4 is concerned, it is stated that revision of the transport rebate has taken place but such revision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, therefore, they may be permitted to challenge the revision, which is in force as on date by filing an appropriate petition.
The writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for.
Order Date :- 15.12.2015
Ashish Pd.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!