Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 1724 ALL
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 34 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1095 of 1995 Revisionist :- Nathu Ram Opposite Party :- Smt. Guddi & Another Counsel for Revisionist :- R.P.S. Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revised. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by order dated 5.6.1995 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Agra in Case No. 101 of 1991, Smt. Guddi Vs. Nathu Ram under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station New Agra, District Agra, by which opposite party no.1 has been awarded maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month by the revisionist from the date of filing of application.
3. Having gone through the impugned order, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality so as to warrant interference.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 7.8.2015
Ashish Pd.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!