Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 150 ALL
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2015
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 34 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1506 of 1992 Revisionist :- Ram Chandra Singh Opposite Party :- Surendra & Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.S. Rathore Counsel for Opposite Party :- AGA Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Today this case has been listed peremptorily and still adjournment has been sought on account of illness by learned counsel for the revisionist.
2. In view of aforesaid circumstances and considering the fact that this is the consecutive adjournment sought by learned counsel for revisionist on account of illness, I do not find any justification to accept the same. The request for adjournment is accordingly rejected.
3. Called in revised. None appeared on behalf of learned counsel for the revisionist to press this revision.
4. This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by order dated 24.3.1992 passed by Additional Chief Metropoliton Magistrate-III, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Trial No. 2241 of 1990, State Vs. Surendra, under Sections 452, 323, 504 I.P.C., Police Station Kidwainagar, District Kanpurnagar, whereby respondents no. 1,2,3 and 4 have been acquitted.
5. Having gone through the impugned order, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality so as to warrant interference.
6. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 24.4.2015
Ashish Pd.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!