Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 7944 ALL
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 59 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58017 of 2014 Petitioner :- Neelam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- V.K. Dwivedi,C.B. Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.K. Yadav Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 and learned standing for the State-Respondents.
The issue involved in this writ petition is as to whether reservation would be applicable to the selection of "Prerak" or not.
Prima facie the impugned order contains contradictory recitals in this regard at page 26 of the writ petition.
Learned standing counsel may produce the relevant records including government order referred in the impugned order relating to the selection of "Prerak".
List this matter on 11.11.2014 as fresh.
Order Date :- 31.10.2014
SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!